vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NOAH HOLDINGS LTD (NOAH) and Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. (TCRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0K vs $2.3K, roughly 1.3× NOAH HOLDINGS LTD).
Noah Holdings is a Chinese financial services company headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest independent wealth management company in China.
Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops novel T cell receptor (TCR) immunotherapies for the treatment of hard-to-treat solid tumors. The firm focuses on advancing precision oncology candidates targeting shared tumor antigens, serving global oncology patient populations via internal R&D and cross-sector partnerships.
NOAH vs TCRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3K | $3.0K |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 69.3% | — |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -40.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -20.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3K | $3.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4K | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.8M | $2.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2K | $5.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2K | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -54600.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29150.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -174200.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53650.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28225.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -168200.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.8K | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.2M |
| Total Assets | $223.8K | $3.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.8K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.5K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $698.3M | $319.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.1K | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.9K | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.8K | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $223.8K | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.8K | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.6K | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.7K | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -98900.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3266.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-844.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-701.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.1M | $-772.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-781.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -98900.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3266.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
