vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hour Loop, Inc (HOUR) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hour Loop, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.1M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.1× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -1.2%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Hour Loop, Inc's revenue compounded faster (50.7% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Hour Loop, Inc. is an e-commerce retail company that offers a diverse portfolio of products including home goods, apparel, toys, electronics accessories, and daily consumer essentials. It primarily operates through leading third-party online marketplaces, with its core customer base concentrated in North America, focusing on delivering affordable, high-value daily products to mass consumers.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
HOUR vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.1M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-657.3K | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -1.2% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.0% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.1M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.7M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-657.3K | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $530.6K | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.5K | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.6K | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $649.1K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 49.6% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.4% | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.7% | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.8% | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.7% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.6% | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $23.8M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7M | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.4K | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-901.5K | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9K | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $456.2K | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.9K | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-901.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.4K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.94× | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.77× | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.04× | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.64× | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
