vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) and PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. (PTCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HighPeak Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($216.6M vs $164.7M, roughly 1.3× PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC.). HighPeak Energy, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -11.6% vs -82.0%, a 70.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-22.7% vs -23.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-11.5% CAGR vs -13.2%).
Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company serves over 7 million customers in the eastern United States. In 2024 it ranked as the 141st largest company in the United States – its highest-ever placement on the Fortune 500 list.
PTC Therapeutics, Inc. is a US pharmaceutical company focused on the development of orally administered small molecule drugs and gene therapy which regulate gene expression by targeting post-transcriptional control (PTC) mechanisms in orphan diseases.
HPK vs PTCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $216.6M | $164.7M |
| Net Profit | $-25.2M | $-135.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -43.3% |
| Net Margin | -11.6% | -82.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.3% | -22.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -380.7% | -104.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-1.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $216.6M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.9M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.4M | $178.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $257.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | $213.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.6M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.3M | $186.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.8M | $210.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-25.2M | $-135.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $-64.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $866.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.9M | $-106.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $-99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-91.6M |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | -43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.1% | 82.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | -76.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | -27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.7% | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.8% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -11.6% | -82.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 73.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | -30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | -54.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -53.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -43.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $10.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $-1.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $-1.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $162.1M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $-205.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $162.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.4M | $884.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $-205.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $-155.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-206.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $-185.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $-980.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $-893.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $93.1M | $-34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $702.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.2M | $-66.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $-58.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.1M | $870.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.5M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.1M | $-77.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.3M | $-71.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.4M | $70.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-69.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-59.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $868.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-77.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-78.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 73.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.32× | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.81× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HPK
| Crude Oil Sales | $152.1M | 70% |
| Natural Gas And NGL Sales | $60.8M | 28% |
PTCT
Segment breakdown not available.
