vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) and Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.0M vs $158.6M, roughly 1.6× Stoke Therapeutics, Inc.). Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 71.2% vs -109.4%, a 180.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3661.1% vs 22.1%).
Hudson Pacific Properties is a real estate investment trust with 15.8 million square feet of office buildings, 1.5 million square feet of sound stages, and undeveloped rights for 3 million square feet of additional commercial property. Its properties are on the West Coast of the United States and Vancouver. It is organized in Maryland and headquartered in Los Angeles. It is the largest independent operator of sound stages in Los Angeles.
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing innovative RNA-targeted therapies for severe rare genetic diseases. Its lead candidates address unmet needs for Dravet syndrome, a rare epilepsy, and other neurological monogenic disorders, serving patients across North America and global markets.
HPP vs STOK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.0M | $158.6M |
| Net Profit | $-280.2M | $112.9M |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -109.8% | 70.2% |
| Net Margin | -109.4% | 71.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.1% | 3661.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.5% | 528.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-11.57 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.5M | $158.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $209.7M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-280.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-144.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.3M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-173.5M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-107.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -109.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -77.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -40.4% | 70.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -83.2% | -60.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -109.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -77.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -40.5% | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.7% | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.57 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.53 | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.19 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $138.4M | $274.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $350.1M |
| Total Assets | $7.3B | $406.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $138.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $236.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.5M | $274.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.3M | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $350.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $229.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $406.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1B | $271.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $121.0M | $131.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $131.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 83.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $121.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.5M | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -102.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HPP
| Core Office | $217.1M | 85% |
| Studio Segment | $21.8M | 9% |
| Ancillary Revenue | $20.2M | 8% |
| Chargebacks | $3.3M | 1% |
STOK
Segment breakdown not available.
