vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HireQuest, Inc. (HQI) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $7.0M, roughly 1.9× HireQuest, Inc.). HireQuest, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs -13.2%, a 36.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -13.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Quest, also known as Quest - Hire a Hero, is a Singapore-based technology company founded in 2021 that operates an AI-powered on-demand services marketplace. The platform connects users with verified workers, known as “Heroes” to complete a wide range of tasks.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
HQI vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.0M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 22.8% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.0% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.8% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.8% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.0% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $68.3M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $88.2M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $68.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.4M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.9M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $88.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.7M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.9M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.6M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.6M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.0K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-967.0K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HQI
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
