vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $53.6M, roughly 1.1× HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.). HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($45.3M vs $-21.1M).
HomeTrust Bancshares Inc. is an Asheville, North Carolina–based bank holding company with $4.3 billion in assets and 33 branches in North and South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee. It is the parent of seven community banks—HomeTrust Bank, Tryon Federal Bank, Shelby Savings Bank, Home Savings Bank, Industrial Federal Bank, Cherryville Federal Bank and Rutherford County Bank.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
HTB vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $53.6M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.7M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.6M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.4% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.95 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.84 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.88 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $324.7M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $600.7M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $324.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $297.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $279.2M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.2M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $600.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $579.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $565.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.8M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $523.6M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $513.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.5M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $45.3M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 84.5% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 84.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 138.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.0% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 85.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.93× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
