vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of High-Trend International Group (HTCO) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $99.4M, roughly 1.3× High-Trend International Group). IMAX CORP runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -13.4%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, High-Trend International Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (185.2% vs 35.1%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $6.5M).
Motor Trend Group, LLC is a media company that specializes in enthusiast brands, such as Motor Trend and Hot Rod. Headquartered in El Segundo, California, it was a subsidiary of the TNT Sports division of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) until being sold to Hearst Communications in 2024.
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
HTCO vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $99.4M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $-13.3M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | 4.0% | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | -12.5% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | -13.4% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 185.2% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1624.0% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.29 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.4M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.9M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $79.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-771.7K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.29 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.37 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.2M | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.2M | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $41.7M | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $267.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.7M | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4M | $827.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $824.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.5M | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.5M | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -15.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTCO
Segment breakdown not available.
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
