vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (INR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
H2O AMERICA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.4M vs $115.5M, roughly 1.7× INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.). INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 8.1%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
HTO vs INR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $115.5M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $20.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 47.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $72.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $84.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $-34.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | -104.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | -41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $1.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $-2.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $2.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $55.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $307.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $55.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $123.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $307.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-52.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $953.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | $75.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | 3.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 4.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | 3.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
INR
| Oil Reserves | $54.0M | 47% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $46.8M | 41% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $14.7M | 13% |
