vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and SANFILIPPO JOHN B & SON INC (JBSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANFILIPPO JOHN B & SON INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.8M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.6× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 5.7%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SANFILIPPO JOHN B & SON INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.6% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 7.6%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
John B. Sanfilippo & Son Inc. (JBSS) is a leading US processor, marketer and distributor of high-quality tree nuts, peanuts, dried fruits, and value-added snack products. It serves retail, foodservice, and industrial ingredient customers primarily across North America, offering both branded and private label product lines.
HTO vs JBSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $314.8M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $18.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | 32.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $1.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $314.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $269.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $260.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $301.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $276.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $269.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $271.9M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $13.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.1% |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $1.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $1.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $1.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $0.85 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $1.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $2.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $28.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $370.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $617.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $714.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $585.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $336.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $442.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $484.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $377.0K |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $370.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $362.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $360.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $346.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $310.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $321.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $617.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $598.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $597.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $590.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $545.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $519.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $515.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $491.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | $62.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $40.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | 3.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $32.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $62.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | -1.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 3.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | 0.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
JBSS
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $263.2M | 84% |
| Sales Channel Commercial Ingredients | $28.0M | 9% |
| Sales Channel Contract Packaging | $23.6M | 8% |
