vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($242.1M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.2× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 5.0%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 7.1%).

H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.

HTO vs OSW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OSW
OSW
1.2× larger
OSW
$242.1M
$199.4M
HTO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
OSW
OSW
+10.0% gap
OSW
11.5%
1.5%
HTO
Higher net margin
HTO
HTO
3.2% more per $
HTO
8.1%
5.0%
OSW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HTO
HTO
Annualised
HTO
15.3%
7.1%
OSW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Revenue
$199.4M
$242.1M
Net Profit
$16.2M
$12.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
16.6%
6.8%
Net Margin
8.1%
5.0%
Revenue YoY
1.5%
11.5%
Net Profit YoY
-29.2%
-16.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.45
$0.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$199.4M
$242.1M
Q3 25
$243.5M
$258.5M
Q2 25
$197.8M
$240.7M
Q1 25
$164.9M
$219.6M
Q4 24
$196.5M
$217.2M
Q3 24
$216.7M
$241.7M
Q2 24
$173.1M
$224.9M
Q1 24
$150.0M
$211.2M
Net Profit
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$16.2M
$12.1M
Q3 25
$45.1M
$24.3M
Q2 25
$24.7M
$19.9M
Q1 25
$16.6M
$15.3M
Q4 24
$22.9M
$14.4M
Q3 24
$38.7M
$21.6M
Q2 24
$20.7M
$15.8M
Q1 24
$11.7M
$21.2M
Operating Margin
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
16.6%
6.8%
Q3 25
26.5%
10.2%
Q2 25
22.2%
9.2%
Q1 25
21.8%
7.7%
Q4 24
22.2%
7.9%
Q3 24
26.9%
10.3%
Q2 24
23.4%
8.4%
Q1 24
18.6%
8.0%
Net Margin
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
8.1%
5.0%
Q3 25
18.5%
9.4%
Q2 25
12.5%
8.3%
Q1 25
10.0%
7.0%
Q4 24
11.7%
6.6%
Q3 24
17.8%
8.9%
Q2 24
12.0%
7.0%
Q1 24
7.8%
10.0%
EPS (diluted)
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$0.45
$0.12
Q3 25
$1.27
$0.23
Q2 25
$0.71
$0.19
Q1 25
$0.49
$0.15
Q4 24
$0.70
$0.13
Q3 24
$1.17
$0.20
Q2 24
$0.64
$0.15
Q1 24
$0.36
$0.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$20.7M
$16.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.9B
$84.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$542.6M
Total Assets
$5.1B
$707.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.23×
0.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$20.7M
$16.3M
Q3 25
$11.3M
$29.6M
Q2 25
$19.8M
$35.0M
Q1 25
$23.7M
$22.6M
Q4 24
$11.1M
$57.4M
Q3 24
$4.0M
$48.8M
Q2 24
$22.8M
$62.5M
Q1 24
$4.5M
$65.4M
Total Debt
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$1.9B
$84.0M
Q3 25
$85.2M
Q2 25
$96.2M
Q1 25
$97.4M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$98.6M
Q3 24
$98.7M
Q2 24
$123.8M
Q1 24
$138.6M
Stockholders' Equity
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$1.5B
$542.6M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$552.8M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$548.3M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$530.6M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$554.5M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$540.1M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$532.7M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$515.5M
Total Assets
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$5.1B
$707.1M
Q3 25
$5.0B
$732.6M
Q2 25
$4.8B
$731.8M
Q1 25
$4.7B
$708.7M
Q4 24
$4.7B
$746.4M
Q3 24
$4.6B
$734.0M
Q2 24
$4.4B
$756.8M
Q1 24
$4.4B
$763.6M
Debt / Equity
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
1.23×
0.15×
Q3 25
0.15×
Q2 25
0.18×
Q1 25
0.18×
Q4 24
1.26×
0.18×
Q3 24
0.18×
Q2 24
0.23×
Q1 24
0.27×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$63.5M
$20.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$14.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.92×
1.65×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$68.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$63.5M
$20.0M
Q3 25
$77.3M
$33.2M
Q2 25
$60.8M
$20.3M
Q1 25
$43.2M
$10.1M
Q4 24
$41.5M
$16.6M
Q3 24
$53.5M
$28.6M
Q2 24
$49.3M
$18.7M
Q1 24
$51.2M
$15.0M
Free Cash Flow
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
$14.9M
Q3 25
$27.6M
Q2 25
$17.6M
Q1 25
$8.4M
Q4 24
$13.2M
Q3 24
$27.5M
Q2 24
$17.6M
Q1 24
$13.7M
FCF Margin
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
6.2%
Q3 25
10.7%
Q2 25
7.3%
Q1 25
3.8%
Q4 24
6.1%
Q3 24
11.4%
Q2 24
7.8%
Q1 24
6.5%
Capex Intensity
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
2.1%
Q3 25
2.2%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
0.8%
Q4 24
1.5%
Q3 24
0.5%
Q2 24
0.5%
Q1 24
0.6%
Cash Conversion
HTO
HTO
OSW
OSW
Q4 25
3.92×
1.65×
Q3 25
1.71×
1.36×
Q2 25
2.47×
1.02×
Q1 25
2.61×
0.66×
Q4 24
1.81×
1.15×
Q3 24
1.39×
1.33×
Q2 24
2.38×
1.19×
Q1 24
4.38×
0.71×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HTO
HTO

Water Utility Services$191.0M96%
Other$8.4M4%

OSW
OSW

Services$197.3M82%
Products$44.8M18%

Related Comparisons