vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

H2O AMERICA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.4M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.5× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 8.1%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 11.6%).

H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.

Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.

HTO vs UE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HTO
HTO
1.5× larger
HTO
$199.4M
$132.6M
UE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
UE
UE
+10.8% gap
UE
12.2%
1.5%
HTO
Higher net margin
UE
UE
8.9% more per $
UE
17.1%
8.1%
HTO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HTO
HTO
Annualised
HTO
15.3%
11.6%
UE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Revenue
$199.4M
$132.6M
Net Profit
$16.2M
$22.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
16.6%
Net Margin
8.1%
17.1%
Revenue YoY
1.5%
12.2%
Net Profit YoY
-29.2%
176.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.45
$0.18

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$132.6M
Q4 25
$199.4M
$119.6M
Q3 25
$243.5M
$120.1M
Q2 25
$197.8M
$114.1M
Q1 25
$164.9M
$118.2M
Q4 24
$196.5M
$116.4M
Q3 24
$216.7M
$112.4M
Q2 24
$173.1M
$106.5M
Net Profit
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$22.6M
Q4 25
$16.2M
$12.4M
Q3 25
$45.1M
$14.9M
Q2 25
$24.7M
$58.0M
Q1 25
$16.6M
$8.2M
Q4 24
$22.9M
$30.1M
Q3 24
$38.7M
$9.1M
Q2 24
$20.7M
$30.8M
Operating Margin
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
Q4 25
16.6%
11.3%
Q3 25
26.5%
13.4%
Q2 25
22.2%
53.9%
Q1 25
21.8%
7.6%
Q4 24
22.2%
27.6%
Q3 24
26.9%
8.9%
Q2 24
23.4%
30.6%
Net Margin
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
17.1%
Q4 25
8.1%
10.4%
Q3 25
18.5%
12.4%
Q2 25
12.5%
50.8%
Q1 25
10.0%
6.9%
Q4 24
11.7%
25.9%
Q3 24
17.8%
8.1%
Q2 24
12.0%
28.9%
EPS (diluted)
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$0.18
Q4 25
$0.45
$0.09
Q3 25
$1.27
$0.12
Q2 25
$0.71
$0.46
Q1 25
$0.49
$0.07
Q4 24
$0.70
$0.25
Q3 24
$1.17
$0.07
Q2 24
$0.64
$0.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$20.7M
$50.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$1.4B
Total Assets
$5.1B
$3.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.23×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$50.0M
Q4 25
$20.7M
$48.9M
Q3 25
$11.3M
$77.8M
Q2 25
$19.8M
$53.0M
Q1 25
$23.7M
$48.0M
Q4 24
$11.1M
$41.4M
Q3 24
$4.0M
$67.9M
Q2 24
$22.8M
$78.6M
Total Debt
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.9B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$1.7B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$1.3B
Total Assets
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$3.4B
Q4 25
$5.1B
$3.3B
Q3 25
$5.0B
$3.3B
Q2 25
$4.8B
$3.3B
Q1 25
$4.7B
$3.3B
Q4 24
$4.7B
$3.3B
Q3 24
$4.6B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$4.4B
$3.2B
Debt / Equity
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.23×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.26×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$63.5M
$39.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.92×
1.73×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
$39.1M
Q4 25
$63.5M
$182.7M
Q3 25
$77.3M
$55.7M
Q2 25
$60.8M
$43.5M
Q1 25
$43.2M
$32.6M
Q4 24
$41.5M
$153.2M
Q3 24
$53.5M
$36.6M
Q2 24
$49.3M
$41.2M
Free Cash Flow
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
Q4 25
$81.8M
Q3 25
$26.1M
Q2 25
$19.6M
Q1 25
$11.9M
Q4 24
$42.5M
Q3 24
$12.2M
Q2 24
$19.9M
FCF Margin
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
Q4 25
68.4%
Q3 25
21.7%
Q2 25
17.2%
Q1 25
10.0%
Q4 24
36.6%
Q3 24
10.8%
Q2 24
18.6%
Capex Intensity
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
1.5%
Q4 25
84.4%
Q3 25
24.6%
Q2 25
20.9%
Q1 25
17.5%
Q4 24
95.1%
Q3 24
21.7%
Q2 24
20.1%
Cash Conversion
HTO
HTO
UE
UE
Q1 26
1.73×
Q4 25
3.92×
14.71×
Q3 25
1.71×
3.73×
Q2 25
2.47×
0.75×
Q1 25
2.61×
3.97×
Q4 24
1.81×
5.09×
Q3 24
1.39×
4.03×
Q2 24
2.38×
1.34×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HTO
HTO

Water Utility Services$191.0M96%
Other$8.4M4%

UE
UE

Rental revenue$124.2M94%
Other$8.4M6%

Related Comparisons