vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and YELP INC (YELP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
YELP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($360.0M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.8× H2O AMERICA). YELP INC runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs 8.1%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, H2O AMERICA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.5% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 4.0%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
Yelp Inc. is an American company that develops the Yelp.com website and the Yelp mobile app, which publishes crowd-sourced reviews about businesses. It also operates Yelp Guest Manager, a table reservation service. It is headquartered in San Francisco.
HTO vs YELP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $360.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $37.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | -10.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $360.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $376.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $370.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $358.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $362.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $357.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $332.8M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $24.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $319.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $710.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $958.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $319.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $324.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $317.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $397.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $384.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $420.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $710.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $733.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $746.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $728.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $744.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $739.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $735.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $722.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $958.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $989.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $980.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $985.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $983.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $980.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $965.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $993.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | $84.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $72.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | 2.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $323.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $84.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $131.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $102.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | $72.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $118.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $65.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | 2.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | 4.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | 5.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
YELP
| Advertising Services | $231.4M | 64% |
| Advertising Restaurants And Other | $106.8M | 30% |
| Other Revenue | $21.8M | 6% |
