vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ) and Rockwell Automation (ROK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rockwell Automation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.0× HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC). Rockwell Automation runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs -9.6%, a 24.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rockwell Automation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Rockwell Automation's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. is an American provider of industrial automation and digital transformation technologies headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its brands include Allen-Bradley, FactoryTalk software and LifecycleIQ Services. Rockwell Automation employs approximately 27,000 people and has customers in more than 100 countries worldwide.
HTZ vs ROK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-194.0M | $305.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.3% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 20.7% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 14.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.5% | 65.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $2.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-194.0M | $305.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-294.0M | $295.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-443.0M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-479.0M | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $239.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-865.0M | $232.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0M | $266.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.2% |
| Q4 25 | -11.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.9% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $2.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.95 | $2.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.44 | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.57 | $1.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.34 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.82 | $2.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.61 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $565.0M | $444.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-459.0M | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $22.3B | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $565.0M | $444.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.0M | $495.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.0M | $456.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $477.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.0M | $471.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $568.0M | $407.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $465.0M | $470.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-459.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-317.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-504.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $22.3B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.0B | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3B | $11.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $193.0M | $234.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $170.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $193.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $835.0M | $454.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.0M | $527.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | $364.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.0M | $432.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $546.0M | $279.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.0M | $119.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $171.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $238.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $68.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.54× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
ROK
| Productsand Solutions | $1.9B | 89% |
| Lifecycle Services Segment | $259.0M | 12% |
