vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs -9.6%, a 33.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
HTZ vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-194.0M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.5% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-194.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.0M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-294.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-443.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-479.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-865.0M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | -11.0% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.1% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.9% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | -9.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.95 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.44 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.57 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.34 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.82 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.61 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $565.0M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-459.0M | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $22.3B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $565.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.0M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.0M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.0M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $568.0M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $465.0M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-459.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-317.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-504.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $22.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3B | $3.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $193.0M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $193.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $835.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.0M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $546.0M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.0M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.54× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
