vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ) and TEREX CORP (TEX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× TEREX CORP). TEREX CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs -9.6%, a 14.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEREX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, TEREX CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
Terex Corporation is an American company and worldwide manufacturer of materials processing machinery, waste and recycling equipment, mobile elevating work platforms, and equipment for the electric utility industry. Terex does business in the Americas, Europe, Australia and Asia Pacific.
HTZ vs TEX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-194.0M | $63.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 6.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.5% | 2963.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $0.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $-194.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-294.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-443.0M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-479.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-865.0M | $140.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0M | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | -11.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.9% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -9.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.46 | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.95 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.44 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.57 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.34 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.82 | $2.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.61 | $1.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $565.0M | $772.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-459.0M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $22.3B | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $565.0M | $772.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $509.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.0M | $374.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.0M | $298.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $388.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.0M | $352.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $568.0M | $319.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $465.0M | $364.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-459.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-317.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-504.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $681.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $22.3B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.0B | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $193.0M | $205.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $171.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.25× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $322.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $193.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $835.0M | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.0M | $102.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | $177.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $894.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $546.0M | $66.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.0M | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $171.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-68.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.54× | 2.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
TEX
| Aerials Segment | $466.0M | 35% |
| Materials Processing Segment | $428.0M | 32% |
| Materials Processing Equipment | $279.0M | 21% |
| Specialty Equipment | $148.0M | 11% |
