vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $883.8M, roughly 1.7× RH). Hubbell Incorporated runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs 4.1%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hubbell Incorporated posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 8.9%). Hubbell Incorporated produced more free cash flow last quarter ($388.8M vs $83.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RH's revenue compounded faster (9.4% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
HUBB vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $738.3M |
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.8M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 43.5% |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.73 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | $101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.3M | $123.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $-289.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $-297.4M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $-114.0M |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $-251.5M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | -10.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
