vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.4× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 14.6%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 11.9%). Hubbell Incorporated produced more free cash flow last quarter ($388.8M vs $218.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
HUBB vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.8M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.73 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.3M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
