vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Humana (HUM) and Meta Platforms (META). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Meta Platforms is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($59.9B vs $32.5B, roughly 1.8× Humana). Meta Platforms runs the higher net margin — 38.0% vs -2.4%, a 40.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Meta Platforms posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.8% vs 11.3%). Meta Platforms produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.8B vs $-1.9B). Over the past eight quarters, Meta Platforms's revenue compounded faster (28.2% CAGR vs 4.8%).

Humana Inc. is an American for-profit health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky. In 2024, the company ranked 92 on the Fortune 500 list, which made it the highest ranked company based in Kentucky. It is the fourth largest health insurance provider in the U.S.

Meta Platforms, Inc. is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Menlo Park, California. Meta owns and operates several prominent social media platforms and communication services, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, Threads and Manus. The company also operates an advertising network for its own sites and third parties; as of 2023, advertising accounted for 97.8 percent of its total revenue. Meta has been described as a Big Tech company.

HUM vs META — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
META
META
1.8× larger
META
$59.9B
$32.5B
HUM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
META
META
+12.5% gap
META
23.8%
11.3%
HUM
Higher net margin
META
META
40.5% more per $
META
38.0%
-2.4%
HUM
More free cash flow
META
META
$16.7B more FCF
META
$14.8B
$-1.9B
HUM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
META
META
Annualised
META
28.2%
4.8%
HUM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HUM
HUM
META
META
Revenue
$32.5B
$59.9B
Net Profit
$-796.0M
$22.8B
Gross Margin
81.8%
Operating Margin
-2.5%
41.3%
Net Margin
-2.4%
38.0%
Revenue YoY
11.3%
23.8%
Net Profit YoY
-14.9%
9.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-6.59
$8.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$32.5B
$59.9B
Q3 25
$32.6B
$51.2B
Q2 25
$32.4B
$47.5B
Q1 25
$32.1B
$42.3B
Q4 24
$29.2B
$48.4B
Q3 24
$29.4B
$40.6B
Q2 24
$29.5B
$39.1B
Q1 24
$29.6B
$36.5B
Net Profit
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$-796.0M
$22.8B
Q3 25
$195.0M
$2.7B
Q2 25
$545.0M
$18.3B
Q1 25
$1.2B
$16.6B
Q4 24
$-693.0M
$20.8B
Q3 24
$480.0M
$15.7B
Q2 24
$679.0M
$13.5B
Q1 24
$741.0M
$12.4B
Gross Margin
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
81.8%
Q3 25
82.0%
Q2 25
82.1%
Q1 25
82.1%
Q4 24
81.7%
Q3 24
81.8%
Q2 24
81.3%
Q1 24
81.8%
Operating Margin
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
-2.5%
41.3%
Q3 25
1.2%
40.1%
Q2 25
3.4%
43.0%
Q1 25
6.3%
41.5%
Q4 24
-1.9%
48.3%
Q3 24
2.5%
42.7%
Q2 24
3.9%
38.0%
Q1 24
4.2%
37.9%
Net Margin
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
-2.4%
38.0%
Q3 25
0.6%
5.3%
Q2 25
1.7%
38.6%
Q1 25
3.9%
39.3%
Q4 24
-2.4%
43.1%
Q3 24
1.6%
38.7%
Q2 24
2.3%
34.5%
Q1 24
2.5%
33.9%
EPS (diluted)
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$-6.59
$8.87
Q3 25
$1.62
$1.05
Q2 25
$4.51
$7.14
Q1 25
$10.30
$6.43
Q4 24
$-5.73
$7.96
Q3 24
$3.98
$6.03
Q2 24
$5.62
$5.16
Q1 24
$6.11
$4.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HUM
HUM
META
META
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$19.9B
$81.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$58.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$17.7B
$217.2B
Total Assets
$48.9B
$366.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.27×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$19.9B
$81.6B
Q3 25
$22.1B
$44.4B
Q2 25
$21.7B
$47.1B
Q1 25
$22.1B
$70.2B
Q4 24
$20.4B
$77.8B
Q3 24
$24.1B
$70.9B
Q2 24
$22.9B
$58.1B
Q1 24
$22.6B
$58.1B
Total Debt
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$58.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$28.8B
Q3 24
$28.8B
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$17.7B
$217.2B
Q3 25
$18.5B
$194.1B
Q2 25
$18.2B
$195.1B
Q1 25
$17.8B
$185.0B
Q4 24
$16.4B
$182.6B
Q3 24
$17.6B
$164.5B
Q2 24
$16.7B
$156.8B
Q1 24
$16.1B
$149.5B
Total Assets
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$48.9B
$366.0B
Q3 25
$49.7B
$303.8B
Q2 25
$50.4B
$294.7B
Q1 25
$50.9B
$280.2B
Q4 24
$46.5B
$276.1B
Q3 24
$50.0B
$256.4B
Q2 24
$50.1B
$230.2B
Q1 24
$50.1B
$222.8B
Debt / Equity
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
0.27×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.16×
Q3 24
0.18×
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HUM
HUM
META
META
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.7B
$36.2B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-1.9B
$14.8B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-5.7%
24.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.6%
35.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.59×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$375.0M
$46.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$-1.7B
$36.2B
Q3 25
$971.0M
$30.0B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$25.6B
Q1 25
$331.0M
$24.0B
Q4 24
$-528.0M
$28.0B
Q3 24
$1.9B
$24.7B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$19.4B
Q1 24
$423.0M
$19.2B
Free Cash Flow
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
$-1.9B
$14.8B
Q3 25
$836.0M
$11.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$9.0B
Q1 25
$236.0M
$11.1B
Q4 24
$-682.0M
$13.6B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$16.5B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$11.2B
Q1 24
$246.0M
$12.8B
FCF Margin
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
-5.7%
24.8%
Q3 25
2.6%
21.8%
Q2 25
3.6%
19.0%
Q1 25
0.7%
26.2%
Q4 24
-2.3%
28.0%
Q3 24
5.9%
40.6%
Q2 24
3.7%
28.7%
Q1 24
0.8%
35.2%
Capex Intensity
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
0.6%
35.7%
Q3 25
0.4%
36.7%
Q2 25
0.4%
34.8%
Q1 25
0.3%
30.6%
Q4 24
0.5%
29.8%
Q3 24
0.4%
20.3%
Q2 24
0.4%
20.9%
Q1 24
0.6%
17.6%
Cash Conversion
HUM
HUM
META
META
Q4 25
1.59×
Q3 25
4.98×
11.07×
Q2 25
2.33×
1.39×
Q1 25
0.27×
1.44×
Q4 24
1.34×
Q3 24
3.87×
1.58×
Q2 24
1.79×
1.44×
Q1 24
0.57×
1.56×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HUM
HUM

Insurance Segment$31.3B96%
Other$880.0M3%
Services$292.0M1%

META
META

Advertising$58.1B97%
Reality Labs$955.0M2%
Service Other$801.0M1%

Related Comparisons