vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) and CS Disco, Inc. (LAW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CS Disco, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.2M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.9× i-80 Gold Corp.). CS Disco, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -20.7% vs -401.9%, a 381.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. CS Disco, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($255.0K vs $-39.2M).
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
CS Disco, Inc. is a leading legal technology provider that develops cloud-based software solutions for legal practitioners. Its core offerings include e-discovery, document review, case management, and legal workflow automation tools, serving law firms, corporate legal teams, and government legal departments primarily in North America.
IAUX vs LAW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $41.2M |
| Net Profit | $-85.6M | $-8.5M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | -291.6% | -22.4% |
| Net Margin | -401.9% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 66.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-85.6M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.9M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.2M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.2M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.1M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 75.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 74.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.7% | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -171.4% | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.1% |
| Q4 25 | -291.6% | -22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.7% | -35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.4% | -31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -112.3% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -70.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -210.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -435.2% | -34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -34.7% |
| Q4 25 | -401.9% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -130.8% | -33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -108.5% | -28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -293.3% | -31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -374.5% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -570.8% | -30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -29.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | $114.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $346.8M | $128.1M |
| Total Assets | $703.4M | $173.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $114.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.9M | $113.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.7M | $114.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $118.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.8M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $148.7M |
| Q4 25 | $174.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.0M | $130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.5M | $137.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $167.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | $170.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $193.2M |
| Q4 25 | $703.4M | $173.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $756.2M | $174.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $782.9M | $164.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $659.0M | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $180.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $194.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $217.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.3M | $762.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.2M | $255.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -184.3% | 0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.1% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | $-18.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | $762.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.2M | $-979.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.6M | $-650.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.2M | $255.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.1M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.8M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | -184.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.7% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.1% | -30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -206.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.1% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -22.5% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
LAW
| Software | $35.1M | 85% |
| Services | $6.0M | 15% |