vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IBEX Ltd (IBEX) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $164.2M, roughly 1.7× IBEX Ltd). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 7.4%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IBEX Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.7% vs -29.1%). IBEX Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-5.1M vs $-57.2M).
The IBEX 35 is the benchmark stock market index of the Bolsa de Madrid, Spain's principal stock exchange. Initiated in 1992, the index is administered and calculated by Sociedad de Bolsas, a subsidiary of Bolsas y Mercados Españoles (BME), the company which runs Spain's securities markets. It is a market capitalization-weighted index comprising the 35 most liquid Spanish stocks traded in the Madrid Stock Exchange General Index and is reviewed twice annually. Trading on options and futures con...
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
IBEX vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $164.2M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $12.2M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.7% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.8% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $164.2M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $594.0K | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $154.5M | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $295.8M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $594.0K | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $726.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $796.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $695.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $802.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $867.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $820.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $154.5M | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $159.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $295.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $274.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $293.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.6M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.1M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.1% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.54× | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.6M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.1M | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.11× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IBEX
| Transferred Over Time | $147.1M | 90% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $17.1M | 10% |
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
