vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IBM (IBM) and IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IBM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.9B vs $8.2B, roughly 1.9× IMPERIAL OIL LTD). IBM runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 4.4%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IBM posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs -10.5%). IBM produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.2B vs $938.8M). Over the past eight quarters, IBM's revenue compounded faster (0.5% CAGR vs -4.2%).
International Business Machines Corporation, doing business as IBM, is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, and present in over 175 countries. It is a publicly traded company and one of the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. IBM is the largest industrial research organization in the world, with 19 research facilities across a dozen countries; for 29 consecutive years, from 1993 to 2021, it held the record for most annual U.S.
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
IBM vs IMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.9B | $8.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $359.2M |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.3% | -59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3B | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8B | $9.8B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $359.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $393.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $692.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $940.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $894.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-330.0M | $903.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $827.1M |
| Q1 26 | 56.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.90 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.31 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $833.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $66.4B | $2.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1B | $16.2B |
| Total Assets | $156.2B | $30.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.01× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6B | $833.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9B | $714.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $66.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $33.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6B | $16.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.9B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9B | $17.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.3B | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0B | $17.5B |
| Q1 26 | $156.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.9B | $30.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.3B | $31.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.6B | $32.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7B | $32.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.2B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.3B | $31.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.8B | $32.2B |
| Q1 26 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.01× | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.10× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.20× | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.2B | $938.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.9% | 11.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.25× | 3.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.2B | $3.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $938.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $944.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $725.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $824.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $997.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $730.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $852.6M |
| Q1 26 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 8.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.77× | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IBM
| Software | $7.1B | 44% |
| Consulting | $5.3B | 33% |
| Infrastructure | $3.3B | 21% |
| Financing | $220.0M | 1% |
IMO
Segment breakdown not available.
