vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IBM (IBM) and L3Harris (LHX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IBM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.9B vs $5.7B, roughly 2.8× L3Harris). L3Harris runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs 7.6%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, L3Harris posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.0% vs 9.7%). IBM produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.2B vs $-187.0M). Over the past eight quarters, L3Harris's revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs 0.4%).
International Business Machines Corporation, doing business as IBM, is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, and present in over 175 countries. It is a publicly traded company and one of the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. IBM is the largest industrial research organization in the world, with 19 research facilities across a dozen countries; for 29 consecutive years, from 1993 to 2021, it held the record for most annual U.S.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company, defense contractor, and information technology services provider that produces products for command and control systems, wireless equipment, tactical radios, avionics and electronic systems, night vision equipment, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and products, ocean systems, instrumentation, navigation products, training devices and services, and both terrestrial/spaceborne antennas for use in the govern...
IBM vs LHX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.9B | $5.7B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $512.0M |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 175.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.7% | 24.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.3% | 32.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | $2.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $15.9B | $21.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $462.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $453.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-330.0M | $400.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $366.0M |
| Q1 26 | 56.3% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.2% | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 25.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.90 | $2.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.31 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.12 | $2.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.36 | $2.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $1.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $590.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $66.4B | $350.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1B | $19.7M |
| Total Assets | $156.2B | $41.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.01× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $10.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6B | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | $482.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | $615.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2B | $539.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $547.0M |
| Q1 26 | $66.4B | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2B | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.0B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | $33.1B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6B | $19.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5B | $19.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4B | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0B | $18.8B |
| Q1 26 | $156.2B | $41.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.9B | $41.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.6B | $41.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7B | $42.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.3B | $41.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.8B | $41.7B |
| Q1 26 | 2.01× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.01× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.10× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.20× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $-95.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.2B | $-187.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.0% | -3.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.25× | -0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.2B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $546.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $640.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $780.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $754.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $427.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $552.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $702.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $657.0M |
| Q1 26 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 2.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 2.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IBM
| Software | $7.1B | 45% |
| Consulting | $5.3B | 33% |
| Infrastructure | $3.3B | 21% |
| Financing | $200.0M | 1% |
LHX
| Space & Mission Systems | $3.0B | 52% |
| Communication & Spectrum Dominance | $1.9B | 32% |
| Missile Solutions | $990.0M | 17% |
