vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IBM (IBM) and T-Mobile US (TMUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T-Mobile US is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.1B vs $15.9B, roughly 1.5× IBM). T-Mobile US runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs 7.6%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, T-Mobile US posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 9.5%). T-Mobile US produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.6B vs $2.2B). Over the past eight quarters, T-Mobile US's revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs 0.5%).
International Business Machines Corporation, doing business as IBM, is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Armonk, New York, and present in over 175 countries. It is a publicly traded company and one of the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. IBM is the largest industrial research organization in the world, with 19 research facilities across a dozen countries; for 29 consecutive years, from 1993 to 2021, it held the record for most annual U.S.
T-Mobile US, Inc. is an American wireless network operator headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. Its majority shareholder and namesake is the German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom. T-Mobile is the second largest wireless carrier in the United States, with 140 million subscribers as of September 30, 2025.
IBM vs TMUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.9B | $23.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $2.5B |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.3% | -15.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | $2.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $15.9B | $23.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $24.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3B | $22.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0B | $21.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5B | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0B | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8B | $19.8B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-330.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | 56.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.28 | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.90 | $1.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.84 | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.31 | $2.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.12 | $2.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.11 | $2.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.36 | $2.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $2.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $66.4B | $86.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.1B | $55.9B |
| Total Assets | $156.2B | $214.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.01× | 1.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $10.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0B | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | $66.4B | $86.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8B | $86.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9B | $78.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $33.1B | $55.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6B | $59.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.9B | $60.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5B | $61.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9B | $61.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.3B | $61.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4B | $64.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0B | $62.6B |
| Q1 26 | $156.2B | $214.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.9B | $219.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.3B | $217.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.6B | $212.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7B | $214.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.2B | $208.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.3B | $210.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.8B | $208.6B |
| Q1 26 | 2.01× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $7.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.2B | $4.6B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.9% | 19.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.25× | 2.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.2B | $18.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | 13.9% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | 4.25× | 2.88× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.77× | 2.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | 2.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 2.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IBM
| Software | $7.1B | 44% |
| Consulting | $5.3B | 33% |
| Infrastructure | $3.3B | 21% |
| Financing | $220.0M | 1% |
TMUS
| Postpaid service revenues | $15.6B | 68% |
| Other | $7.5B | 32% |