vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IDACORP INC (IDA) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IDACORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($360.1M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.4× PicoCELA Inc.). IDACORP INC runs the higher net margin — 12.1% vs -125.2%, a 137.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. IDACORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-216.2M vs $-256.6M).
IDACORP, Inc is an electricity holding company, incorporated in Idaho with headquarters in Boise. It comprises Idaho Power Company, IDACORP Financial and Ida-West Energy. It was formed on October 1, 1998.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
IDA vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $360.1M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $360.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $526.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $411.1M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $375.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $442.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $417.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.95 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $215.7M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.93× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $333.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $634.5M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.8M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-216.2M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -60.0% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 98.3% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-577.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $137.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $109.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-216.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-127.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-156.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-77.0M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-48.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-199.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-150.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -60.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.7% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 98.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IDA
| Retailrevenues | $323.0M | 90% |
| Transmissionserviceswheeling | $18.6M | 5% |
| Energyefficiencyprogramrevenues | $11.7M | 3% |
| Wholesaleenergysales | $10.5M | 3% |
| Otherrevenues | $9.5M | 3% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
