vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of T Stamp Inc (IDAI) and Innventure, Inc. (INV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T Stamp Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($908.9K vs $822.0K, roughly 1.1× Innventure, Inc.). T Stamp Inc runs the higher net margin — -279.9% vs -4593.8%, a 4313.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. T Stamp Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0M vs $-82.1M).
T Stamp Inc, trading under ticker IDAI, develops AI-powered identity verification, trust scoring, and fraud prevention solutions. It serves clients across fintech, healthcare, and e-commerce segments, primarily operating in North America to help organizations securely authenticate user identities and mitigate fraud risks.
Innventure, Inc. is a business development and commercialization firm that partners with large global corporations to turn their underutilized intellectual property and unused R&D innovations into scalable, high-growth independent businesses. It focuses on sectors including sustainability, advanced materials and life sciences, serving primarily North American and European markets.
IDAI vs INV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $908.9K | $822.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-37.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | -1315.8% |
| Operating Margin | -224.9% | -3859.1% |
| Net Margin | -279.9% | -4593.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $908.9K | $822.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $872.5K | $534.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $812.7K | $476.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.5K | $224.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $511.1K | $317.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.4K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $-37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-84.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-143.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1315.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -676.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -501.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -145.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -224.9% | -3859.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -203.0% | -5469.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -207.0% | -29952.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -396.5% | -116606.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -81.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -523.7% | -4313.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -524.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -496.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -279.9% | -4593.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -219.1% | -5305.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -210.7% | -17694.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -395.5% | -63837.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -401.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -245.7% | -697.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -519.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -466.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.72 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.69 | $-1.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.89 | $-3.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.06 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.19 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.97 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.0M | $60.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.7M | $204.2M |
| Total Assets | $11.2M | $599.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.1K | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $598.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $816.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $204.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $190.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $218.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $261.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | $599.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $556.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $556.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $660.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $-80.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0M | $-82.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 215.4% | -9987.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 172.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.7M | $-139.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-82.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 215.4% | -9987.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -459.6% | -3747.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.6% | -4637.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -289.2% | -6970.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -182.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -475.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -320.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -376.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 172.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 82.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 409.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.