vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of T Stamp Inc (IDAI) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $908.9K, roughly 1.0× T Stamp Inc). T Stamp Inc runs the higher net margin — -279.9% vs -506.4%, a 226.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -39.3%). Over the past eight quarters, T Stamp Inc's revenue compounded faster (25.9% CAGR vs -3.9%).
T Stamp Inc, trading under ticker IDAI, develops AI-powered identity verification, trust scoring, and fraud prevention solutions. It serves clients across fintech, healthcare, and e-commerce segments, primarily operating in North America to help organizations securely authenticate user identities and mitigate fraud risks.
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
IDAI vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $908.9K | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -224.9% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -279.9% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.3% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.7% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $908.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $872.5K | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $812.7K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.5K | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $511.1K | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.4K | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.7K | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | -224.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -203.0% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -207.0% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -396.5% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -81.2% | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -523.7% | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -524.7% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -496.7% | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -279.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -219.1% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -210.7% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -395.5% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -401.5% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -245.7% | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -519.3% | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -466.9% | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.72 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.89 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.14 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.06 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.19 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.97 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.0M | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.7M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $11.2M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.1K | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $598.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.5K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $816.7K | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4K | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 215.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 215.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -459.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -289.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -182.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -475.4% | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -320.9% | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -376.6% | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
