vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.0× SuperCom Ltd). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs 37.5%, a 26.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -1.5%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-3.6M).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
IDR vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
