vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Spire Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.8M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.1× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -176.6%, a 240.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -26.9%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-16.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -32.6%).
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
IDR vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | 62.4% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | 64.3% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 92.0% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 220.6% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | 68.5% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.8% | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.8% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | -34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 64.3% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.8% | -73.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.2M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $116.2M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $123.1M |
| Q4 25 | $108.2M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.3M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.6M | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | $116.2M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.1M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $252.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | 2.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.7M | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.2M | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 56.0% | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.7% | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.4M | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $709.8K | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.3% | -45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
