vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IES Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($871.0M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.6× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 10.5%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IES Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.2% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, IES Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 3.8%).
IES Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services to a variety of end markets, including data centers, residential housing, and commercial and industrial facilities.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
IESC vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $871.0M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $91.8M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.1% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.51 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $871.0M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $897.8M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.2M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.0M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $749.5M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.8M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.4M | $500.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | $503.8M |
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.3M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.7M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.5M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $119.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $4.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.99 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.81 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.72 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.7M | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $961.1M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.7M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.3M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $126.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.0M | $133.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $961.1M | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $884.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $781.4M | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $705.8M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $611.1M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.5M | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.8M | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $19.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.30× | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $175.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.3M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.8M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $294.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $176.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IESC
| Communications | $351.9M | 40% |
| Single Family Electrical Contracts | $137.0M | 16% |
| Custom Engineered Solutions | $116.0M | 13% |
| Commercialand Industrial | $94.8M | 11% |
| Single Family Contracts Plumbing HVAC | $82.9M | 10% |
| Multi Familyand Other | $64.2M | 7% |
| Industrial Services | $24.2M | 3% |
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
