vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snowflake Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $871.0M, roughly 1.4× IES Holdings, Inc.). IES Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -24.2%, a 34.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snowflake Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 16.2%). Snowflake Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($113.6M vs $-18.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Snowflake Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs 11.1%).
IES Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services to a variety of end markets, including data centers, residential housing, and commercial and industrial facilities.
Snowflake Inc. is an American cloud-based data platform company founded in San Mateo, California, and headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. It operates a platform that supports data analysis and simultaneous access to data sets with minimal latency. It operates on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
IESC vs SNOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $871.0M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $91.8M | $-294.0M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 67.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | -27.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.1% | 9.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.51 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $871.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $897.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.0M | $986.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $749.5M | $942.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.8M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.4M | $828.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | $774.7M |
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $-294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.3M | $-298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $-430.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $-327.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.7M | $-324.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.5M | $-316.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $-317.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $-169.4M |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 67.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | 66.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 66.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 67.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 68.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | -38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | -35.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | -24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | -26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | -41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -21.9% |
| Q4 25 | $4.51 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.99 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.81 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.50 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.72 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.06 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.67 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $-0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.7M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $961.1M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.0M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $961.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $884.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $781.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $705.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $611.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.5M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.8M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $8.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $137.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $113.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $175.9M | $776.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $228.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $432.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.3M | $101.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.8M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $355.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $344.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.8M | $183.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1M | $88.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.4M | $338.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $331.5M |
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 42.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IESC
| Communications | $351.9M | 40% |
| Single Family Electrical Contracts | $137.0M | 16% |
| Custom Engineered Solutions | $116.0M | 13% |
| Commercialand Industrial | $94.8M | 11% |
| Single Family Contracts Plumbing HVAC | $82.9M | 10% |
| Multi Familyand Other | $64.2M | 7% |
| Industrial Services | $24.2M | 3% |
SNOW
| Products | $1.2B | 96% |
| Professional Services And Other | $54.5M | 4% |
| Related Party | $6.7M | 1% |
