vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $871.0M, roughly 2.0× IES Holdings, Inc.). IES Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -5.5%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 16.2%). Take-Two Interactive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.2M vs $-18.9M). Over the past eight quarters, IES Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 10.2%).
IES Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services to a variety of end markets, including data centers, residential housing, and commercial and industrial facilities.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
IESC vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $871.0M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $91.8M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.1% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.51 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $871.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $897.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $749.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.3M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.7M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.5M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $4.51 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.99 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.81 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.50 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.72 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.06 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.67 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.7M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $961.1M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.0M | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $961.1M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $884.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $781.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $705.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $611.1M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.5M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.8M | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $12.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $175.9M | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.8M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.8M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.4M | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IESC
| Communications | $351.9M | 40% |
| Single Family Electrical Contracts | $137.0M | 16% |
| Custom Engineered Solutions | $116.0M | 13% |
| Commercialand Industrial | $94.8M | 11% |
| Single Family Contracts Plumbing HVAC | $82.9M | 10% |
| Multi Familyand Other | $64.2M | 7% |
| Industrial Services | $24.2M | 3% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.
