vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Infobird Co., Ltd (IFBD) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

High Roller Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3M vs $3.4M, roughly 1.8× Infobird Co., Ltd). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -46.7%, a 105.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Infobird Co., Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17118.0% vs -16.4%).

Infobird Co., Ltd. is a China-based technology firm specializing in AI-powered customer engagement and smart customer service solutions. It serves clients across e-commerce, finance, telecommunications, and internet service sectors, offering cloud-based SaaS tools, intelligent call center systems, and customized digital operation support to help enterprises boost service efficiency and customer satisfaction.

S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.

IFBD vs ROLR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ROLR
ROLR
1.8× larger
ROLR
$6.3M
$3.4M
IFBD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
IFBD
IFBD
+17134.4% gap
IFBD
17118.0%
-16.4%
ROLR
Higher net margin
ROLR
ROLR
105.1% more per $
ROLR
58.4%
-46.7%
IFBD

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Revenue
$3.4M
$6.3M
Net Profit
$-1.6M
$3.7M
Gross Margin
37.2%
Operating Margin
-31.8%
1.3%
Net Margin
-46.7%
58.4%
Revenue YoY
17118.0%
-16.4%
Net Profit YoY
-98.1%
831.9%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.41
$0.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$6.3M
Q2 25
$3.4M
$6.9M
Q1 25
$6.8M
Q3 24
$7.5M
Net Profit
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$3.7M
Q2 25
$-1.6M
$-592.0K
Q1 25
$-3.3M
Q3 24
$-501.0K
Gross Margin
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
Q2 25
37.2%
Q1 25
Q3 24
Operating Margin
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
1.3%
Q2 25
-31.8%
-7.2%
Q1 25
-47.4%
Q3 24
-6.3%
Net Margin
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
58.4%
Q2 25
-46.7%
-8.5%
Q1 25
-48.4%
Q3 24
-6.7%
EPS (diluted)
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$0.39
Q2 25
$-0.41
$-0.07
Q1 25
$-0.39
Q3 24
$-0.07

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$698.0K
$2.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$66.7M
$6.6M
Total Assets
$72.4M
$16.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$2.7M
Q2 25
$698.0K
$2.7M
Q1 25
$3.5M
Q3 24
$1.3M
Stockholders' Equity
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$6.6M
Q2 25
$66.7M
$2.6M
Q1 25
$2.8M
Q3 24
$-779.0K
Total Assets
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$16.0M
Q2 25
$72.4M
$12.3M
Q1 25
$12.8M
Q3 24
$12.9M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1M
$-78.0K
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-90.0K
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-1.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.02×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$-78.0K
Q2 25
$1.1M
$-840.0K
Q1 25
$-3.6M
Q3 24
Free Cash Flow
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
$-90.0K
Q2 25
$-845.0K
Q1 25
$-3.6M
Q3 24
FCF Margin
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
-1.4%
Q2 25
-12.2%
Q1 25
-53.5%
Q3 24
Capex Intensity
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
0.2%
Q2 25
0.1%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q3 24
Cash Conversion
IFBD
IFBD
ROLR
ROLR
Q3 25
-0.02×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

IFBD
IFBD

Segment breakdown not available.

ROLR
ROLR

Net Gaming Revenue$4.9M77%
Net Revenue Noncore Services$1.4M23%

Related Comparisons