vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Opus Genetics, Inc. (IRD) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
High Roller Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3M vs $3.9M, roughly 1.6× Opus Genetics, Inc.). On growth, Opus Genetics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.2% vs -16.4%).
Opus Genetics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the development of targeted gene therapies for inherited retinal diseases. It focuses on addressing unmet medical needs for patients living with rare, vision-threatening ocular conditions, with operations centered on advancing accessible therapeutic candidates for global rare disease patient populations.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
IRD vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | — | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.2% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.5M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -269.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -309.0% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -227.2% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -207.1% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -748.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -450.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -566.9% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -257.5% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -187.5% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -194.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -698.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -415.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.1M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.3M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $50.2M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.7M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-35.3M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-35.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IRD
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
