vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lumen Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.1× International Flavors & Fragrances). International Flavors & Fragrances runs the higher net margin — 0.2% vs -0.1%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, International Flavors & Fragrances posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.6% vs -11.0%). International Flavors & Fragrances produced more free cash flow last quarter ($130.0M vs $-1.1B). Over the past eight quarters, Lumen Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.3% CAGR vs -5.5%).
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) is an American corporation that creates products across taste, texture, scent, nutrition, enzymes, cultures, soy proteins, and probiotics categories, which it markets globally. It is headquartered in New York City and has creative, sales, and manufacturing facilities in 44 countries. The company is a member of the S&P 500 index.
Lumen Technologies, Inc. is an American telecommunications company headquartered in Monroe, Louisiana. It offers network, security, cloud, voice, and other managed communications services through its fiber optic and copper networks, data centers and cloud computing services. The company has been included in the S&P 600 index since March 2023, and was previously listed among the S&P 500.
IFF vs LUMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $5.0M | $-2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | -7.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | -0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.6% | -11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 110.9% | -102.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.0M | $-621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $612.0M | $-915.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0B | $-201.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.0M | $-148.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.0M | $-49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | $57.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.4% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | 42.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.4% | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.3% | 46.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.9% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | -22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | -31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.38 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.98 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.17 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.66 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $590.0M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.6B | $17.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.2B | $-1.1B |
| Total Assets | $25.5B | $34.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $590.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $816.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $671.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $732.0M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.6B |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4B | $-595.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $289.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9B | $464.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $342.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.3B | $466.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3B | $504.0M |
| Q4 25 | $25.5B | $34.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.8B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1B | $33.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3B | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.9B | $34.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.5B | $32.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6B | $33.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 59.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | 37.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $318.0M | $562.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $130.0M | $-1.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | -39.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.3% | 59.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 63.60× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $256.0M | $371.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $318.0M | $562.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.0M | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.0M | $688.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $366.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $237.0M | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $130.0M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.0M | $-321.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.0M | $304.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $-227.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $-242.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.0M | $389.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -39.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.7% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 59.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 23.3% |
| Q4 25 | 63.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.65× | 19.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IFF
| Food Ingredients | $802.0M | 31% |
| Scent | $610.0M | 24% |
| Other | $589.0M | 23% |
| Taste | $588.0M | 23% |
LUMN
| Large Enterprise | $758.0M | 28% |
| Wholesale | $661.0M | 24% |
| Mid Market Enterprise | $472.0M | 17% |
| Fiber Broadband | $232.0M | 8% |
| Other Broadband | $218.0M | 8% |
| Other | $184.0M | 7% |
| Voice And Other | $166.0M | 6% |
| International And Other | $77.0M | 3% |
