vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. (IGIC) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($804.2M vs $403.8M, roughly 2.0× International General Insurance Holdings Ltd.). International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 26.0% vs 24.0%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Company Limited (CTIH) formerly China Insurance International Holdings Company Limited (CIIH), is a Chinese insurance conglomerate. The company has strong Chinese Central Government background despite being incorporated in Hong Kong. It is considered as a red chip company.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
IGIC vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $403.8M | $804.2M |
| Net Profit | $105.1M | $193.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | 26.0% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 26.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 43.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.31 | $3.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $804.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.8M | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.9M | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $369.6M | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.8M | $507.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $193.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.1M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-134.4M | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7M | $100.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.3% | 23.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.92 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.31 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.36 | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $2.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $244.7M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $654.8M | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $237.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $654.8M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $662.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.2M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.6B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
