vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IHS Holding Ltd (IHS) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IHS Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($254.0M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.0× LendingClub Corp). On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -22.0%).
IHS Towers is one of the largest independent owners, operators and developers of shared communications infrastructure in the world, with operations across Africa and Latin America. It is the fifth-largest independent multinational tower company in the world.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
IHS vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $254.0M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $254.0M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.1M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $433.3M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $439.6M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $253.8M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $420.3M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $435.4M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-205.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-124.3M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -48.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.5% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.44 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.61 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.36 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $825.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-89.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $825.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $531.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $629.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $578.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $445.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-89.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-98.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-314.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-308.3M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 85.85× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $246.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $178.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 70.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $718.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $246.9M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.3M | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.7M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.3M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $344.4M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.7M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.6M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.2M | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.7M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.2M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.9M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.3M | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.2M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 70.3% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.5% | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.9% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.2% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.36× | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.52× | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
