vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST (IHT) and Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Knightscope, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5M vs $1.8M, roughly 1.4× INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST). INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST runs the higher net margin — -19.8% vs -435.4%, a 415.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.1% vs -9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Knightscope, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs 2.1%).
InnSuites Hospitality Trust, based in Phoenix, Arizona, is a real estate investment trust that invests in lodging. While it is formed as a real estate investment trust, it is not classified as a real estate investment trust for tax purposes. The company owns interests in two hotels, operates three hotels, provides management for three hotels, and licenses its InnSuites trademark for five hotels. The company's hotel ownership interests are a 51.01% interest in the Best Western InnSuites Tucson...
Knightscope, Inc.KSCPEarnings & Financial Report
Knightscope, Inc. is an American security camera and robotics company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Knightscope designs, builds and deploys robots called Autonomous Data Robots (ADRs) for use in monitoring people in malls, parking lots, neighborhoods and other public areas. Knightscope robots are fully autonomous using self-driving technology and are designed to alert police and security of incidents through sensors that detect weapons, read license plates and detect other suspi...
IHT vs KSCP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8M | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $-356.9K | $-11.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | -63.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10.0% | -444.7% |
| Net Margin | -19.8% | -435.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.1% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -58.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-356.9K | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-391.2K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-121.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-595.2K | $-6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-276.4K | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-370.9K | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-148.6K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-113.0K | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -63.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -64.1% |
| Q4 25 | -10.0% | -444.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.3% | -303.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | -228.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.9% | -234.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.1% | -245.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.5% | -305.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | -211.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.3% | -367.3% |
| Q4 25 | -19.8% | -435.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.7% | -304.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.5% | -230.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.4% | -236.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.1% | -247.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.2% | -430.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | -195.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.5% | -336.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-3.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-2.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $-3.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $20.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.3M | $4.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6M | $27.8M |
| Total Assets | $13.9M | $41.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.12× | 0.14× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6M | $18.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-26.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2M | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.12× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.82× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.37× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.34× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-145.1K | $-10.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-145.1K | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-153.0K | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $279.8K | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-146.7K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.6K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-459.4K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -258.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -187.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IHT
| Room | $1.7M | 96% |
| Other | $74.1K | 4% |
KSCP
| Emergency Communication Devices | $1.5M | 60% |
| Other | $1.0M | 40% |
