vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.0× Information Services Group Inc.). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs 4.3%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MID PENN BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 5.9%). MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, MID PENN BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
III vs MPB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $62.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 43.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | 47.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $42.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $814.1M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $814.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $796.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $667.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $655.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $573.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $559.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $551.0M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $80.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $71.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 115.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $132.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 115.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | 6.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
