vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.5× Information Services Group Inc.). On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
III vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
III
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
