vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIPRECRUITER, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.7M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.8× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -0.7%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 0.6%). ZIPRECRUITER, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.6M vs $4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Information Services Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -4.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
III vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $662.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
III
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
