vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC (IIIN) and Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.1M vs $159.9M, roughly 1.9× INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs 4.7%, a 23.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.3% vs 5.3%). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.9M vs $-2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Insteel Industries Inc is a leading U.S. manufacturer of steel reinforcing products including welded wire reinforcement and steel fibers. It primarily serves non-residential construction, infrastructure, and precast concrete segments across North America, delivering high-performance reinforcement solutions for various construction projects.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE) is an American for-profit corporation that provides services to universities, specializing in program development, online education, and operational support. Formerly affiliated with Grand Canyon University (GCU), a Christian university in Arizona, GCE became a separate publicly traded company in 2008.
IIIN vs LOPE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $159.9M | $308.1M |
| Net Profit | $7.6M | $86.7M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 35.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.3% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 602.4% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $3.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $159.9M | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.4M | $261.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.9M | $247.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $160.7M | $289.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.7M | $292.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.3M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.8M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.4M | $274.7M |
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $81.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $68.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | $3.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.52 | $2.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $2.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $1.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.35 | $2.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.6M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $358.8M | $746.9M |
| Total Assets | $456.1M | $992.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6M | $97.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.7M | $192.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.4M | $144.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.0M | $324.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.5M | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $97.7M | $241.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.9M | $196.2M |
| Q4 25 | $358.8M | $746.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.5M | $758.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.2M | $778.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.4M | $780.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $331.6M | $783.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $350.9M | $764.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.0M | $759.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $340.6M | $759.4M |
| Q4 25 | $456.1M | $992.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $462.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $471.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $422.6M | $992.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.6M | $992.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.2M | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-701.0K | $130.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.2M | $122.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.4% | 39.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.09× | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $439.0K | $238.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-701.0K | $130.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.0M | $-48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $67.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.0M | $135.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $85.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | $122.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.7M | $-58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $126.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-580.0K | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | -1.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.6% | -22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.5% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.09× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.17× | -2.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | 2.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.32× | 0.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.56× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.48× | -0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.86× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.20× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IIIN
| Welded Wire Reinforcement | $108.4M | 68% |
| PC Strand | $51.6M | 32% |
LOPE
Segment breakdown not available.