vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.7M vs $113.9M, roughly 1.3× Industrial Logistics Properties Trust). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust runs the higher net margin — -1.6% vs -5.5%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 3.1%). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($42.0M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 0.7%).

Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates a portfolio of industrial and logistics real estate assets primarily across the United States. Its holdings include distribution centers, warehouses, and last-mile delivery properties, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and supply chain operators to meet their storage and logistics operation needs.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

ILPT vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TARS
TARS
1.3× larger
TARS
$151.7M
$113.9M
ILPT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+125.3% gap
TARS
128.4%
3.1%
ILPT
Higher net margin
ILPT
ILPT
4.0% more per $
ILPT
-1.6%
-5.5%
TARS
More free cash flow
ILPT
ILPT
$29.1M more FCF
ILPT
$42.0M
$13.0M
TARS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
0.7%
ILPT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$113.9M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$-1.8M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-22.1%
-5.3%
Net Margin
-1.6%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
3.1%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
92.6%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.02
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$113.9M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$110.9M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$112.1M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$111.9M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$110.5M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$108.9M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$110.6M
$40.8M
Q1 24
$112.2M
$27.6M
Net Profit
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-1.8M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$-21.6M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$-21.3M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$-21.5M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$-24.1M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$-25.0M
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$-23.2M
$-33.3M
Q1 24
$-23.4M
$-35.7M
Operating Margin
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-22.1%
-5.3%
Q3 25
-29.4%
-12.2%
Q2 25
-30.8%
-21.6%
Q1 25
-26.9%
-33.5%
Q4 24
-31.1%
-36.8%
Q3 24
-33.5%
-52.3%
Q2 24
-32.4%
-81.6%
Q1 24
-31.7%
-136.5%
Net Margin
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-1.6%
-5.5%
Q3 25
-19.4%
-10.6%
Q2 25
-19.0%
-19.8%
Q1 25
-19.2%
-32.1%
Q4 24
-21.8%
-34.8%
Q3 24
-22.9%
-48.7%
Q2 24
-20.9%
-81.6%
Q1 24
-20.9%
-129.4%
EPS (diluted)
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-0.02
$-0.17
Q3 25
$-0.33
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-0.32
$-0.48
Q1 25
$-0.33
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.37
$-0.57
Q3 24
$-0.38
$-0.61
Q2 24
$-0.35
$-0.88
Q1 24
$-0.36
$-1.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$94.8M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.2B
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$489.7M
$343.4M
Total Assets
$5.2B
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
8.56×
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$94.8M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$83.2M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$58.6M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$108.0M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$131.7M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$153.9M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$146.2M
$323.6M
Q1 24
$128.4M
$298.5M
Total Debt
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$4.2B
$72.4M
Q3 25
$4.2B
$72.3M
Q2 25
$4.2B
$72.1M
Q1 25
$4.3B
$72.0M
Q4 24
$4.3B
$71.8M
Q3 24
$4.3B
$71.7M
Q2 24
$4.3B
$71.6M
Q1 24
$4.3B
$29.9M
Stockholders' Equity
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$489.7M
$343.4M
Q3 25
$494.1M
$335.1M
Q2 25
$519.1M
$332.6M
Q1 25
$539.5M
$342.5M
Q4 24
$562.0M
$224.5M
Q3 24
$585.9M
$237.5M
Q2 24
$618.3M
$252.2M
Q1 24
$643.2M
$275.2M
Total Assets
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$5.2B
$562.2M
Q3 25
$5.2B
$534.6M
Q2 25
$5.2B
$495.0M
Q1 25
$5.4B
$500.8M
Q4 24
$5.4B
$377.0M
Q3 24
$5.5B
$376.3M
Q2 24
$5.5B
$376.8M
Q1 24
$5.5B
$349.3M
Debt / Equity
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
8.56×
0.21×
Q3 25
8.49×
0.22×
Q2 25
8.09×
0.22×
Q1 25
7.96×
0.21×
Q4 24
7.65×
0.32×
Q3 24
7.35×
0.30×
Q2 24
6.96×
0.28×
Q1 24
6.70×
0.11×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$60.7M
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$42.0M
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
36.9%
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
16.4%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$79.8M
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$60.7M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$22.7M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$18.4M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$11.4M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$2.0M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$-3.4M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$10.8M
$-14.4M
Q1 24
$8.0M
$-37.8M
Free Cash Flow
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$42.0M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$17.6M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$15.2M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$5.0M
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$-3.7M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$-5.9M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$9.4M
$-15.4M
Q1 24
$5.9M
$-38.0M
FCF Margin
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
36.9%
8.6%
Q3 25
15.9%
13.8%
Q2 25
13.5%
-29.6%
Q1 25
4.5%
-27.1%
Q4 24
-3.4%
-33.5%
Q3 24
-5.5%
-18.6%
Q2 24
8.5%
-37.8%
Q1 24
5.2%
-137.5%
Capex Intensity
ILPT
ILPT
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
16.4%
4.2%
Q3 25
4.6%
1.6%
Q2 25
2.9%
1.0%
Q1 25
5.7%
0.8%
Q4 24
5.2%
0.1%
Q3 24
2.3%
0.6%
Q2 24
1.3%
2.5%
Q1 24
1.9%
0.6%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons