vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Inogen Inc (INGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $68.6M, roughly 1.8× Inogen Inc). On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 3.4%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $-1.9M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 4.2%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Inogen Inc is a medical technology firm specializing in the development, production and distribution of portable oxygen concentrators and associated respiratory care products. It caters primarily to patients with chronic respiratory conditions needing long-term oxygen therapy across North America, Europe and other global markets, focusing on home care and ambulatory patient segments to enhance users' quality of life.
IMAX vs INGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $68.6M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 51.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | -13.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 3.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $68.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $74.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $63.1M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 51.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | 52.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 53.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | 57.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | -10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | -25.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | -23.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $103.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $192.2M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $298.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $103.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $103.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $118.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $113.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $107.4M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $198.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $173.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $187.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $298.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $312.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $308.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $296.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $308.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $315.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $-943.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $-1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | -2.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $-13.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $-943.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $-4.7M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | -9.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
INGN
| Other | $36.1M | 53% |
| Non Us | $32.5M | 47% |
