vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Janus International Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.3M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.8× IMAX CORP). Janus International Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 0.5%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs -4.7%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs -8.8%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
IMAX vs JBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $219.3M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $15.2M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 13.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 28.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $210.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $230.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $254.5M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $300.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $30.7M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 38.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 43.4% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 21.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $560.8M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $110.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $543.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $526.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $518.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $526.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $556.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $535.4M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $1.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $15.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 0.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $140.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $28.6M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $45.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 4.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 171.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |