vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $73.9M, roughly 1.7× Katapult Holdings, Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs 0.5%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 17.3%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 6.6%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
IMAX vs KPLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $73.9M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $19.8M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 307.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $3.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $60.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-570.0K |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $3.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $-2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-2.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-1.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $-38.1M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $107.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $-38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $-58.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $-51.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $-46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $85.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $90.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $106.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $-11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | -16.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | -0.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $-628.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $-653.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | -0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
KPLT
Segment breakdown not available.
