vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $107.1M, roughly 1.2× Krystal Biotech, Inc.). Krystal Biotech, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 48.0% vs 0.5%, a 47.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 17.5%). Krystal Biotech, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($75.4M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Krystal Biotech, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (53.8% CAGR vs 25.8%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Krystal Biotech, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the research, development and commercialization of novel gene therapies for rare, serious dermatological diseases with high unmet medical needs. It primarily serves patients across North America and Europe, focusing on monogenic skin disorders that lack effective standard treatment options.
IMAX vs KRYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $107.1M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 41.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 48.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 17.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 13.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $88.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $70.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $45.3M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $932.0K |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | -14.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 81.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 49.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $496.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $496.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $353.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $308.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $344.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $345.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $359.0M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $984.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $946.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $885.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $838.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $799.2M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $982.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $917.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $853.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $77.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $75.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 70.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $188.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $77.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $39.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $52.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $15.9M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $57.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 70.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 52.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 57.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 32.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | -0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 17.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
KRYS
Segment breakdown not available.
