vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.6× Sezzle Inc.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 54.6% vs 0.5%, a 54.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs 35.1%). Sezzle Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.6M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (76.0% CAGR vs 25.8%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
IMAX vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $42.7M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 70.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 54.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 61.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $8.0M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 98.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $64.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $400.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $212.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $195.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $70.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $70.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 90.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $209.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 73.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
SEZL
| Merchant And Partner Income | $28.9M | 37% |
| Transaction Income | $25.9M | 33% |
| Income From Other Services Late Payment Fees | $20.5M | 26% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
