vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.8× IMAX CORP). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 0.5%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 8.7%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
IMAX vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
