vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Morgan Stanley is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.7B vs $8.2B, roughly 1.3× IMPERIAL OIL LTD). Morgan Stanley runs the higher net margin — 52.6% vs 4.4%, a 48.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Morgan Stanley posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs -10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, IMPERIAL OIL LTD's revenue compounded faster (-4.2% CAGR vs -15.8%).

Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. With offices in 42 countries and more than 80,000 employees, the firm's clients include corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. Morgan Stanley ranked No. 61 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue and in the same year ranked No. 30 in the Forbes Global 2000.

IMO vs MS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MS
MS
1.3× larger
MS
$10.7B
$8.2B
IMO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MS
MS
+26.5% gap
MS
16.0%
-10.5%
IMO
Higher net margin
MS
MS
48.2% more per $
MS
52.6%
4.4%
IMO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
IMO
IMO
Annualised
IMO
-4.2%
-15.8%
MS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Revenue
$8.2B
$10.7B
Net Profit
$359.2M
$5.6B
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
5.6%
Net Margin
4.4%
52.6%
Revenue YoY
-10.5%
16.0%
Net Profit YoY
-59.8%
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
$10.7B
Q4 25
$8.2B
$17.9B
Q3 25
$8.8B
$18.2B
Q2 25
$8.2B
$16.8B
Q1 25
$9.1B
$17.7B
Q4 24
$9.2B
Q3 24
$9.7B
$15.4B
Q2 24
$9.8B
$15.0B
Net Profit
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
$5.6B
Q4 25
$359.2M
$4.4B
Q3 25
$393.5M
$4.6B
Q2 25
$692.8M
$3.5B
Q1 25
$940.2M
$4.3B
Q4 24
$894.3M
Q3 24
$903.0M
$3.2B
Q2 24
$827.1M
$3.1B
Operating Margin
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.6%
32.2%
Q3 25
5.8%
33.1%
Q2 25
11.1%
27.5%
Q1 25
13.5%
31.3%
Q4 24
12.5%
Q3 24
12.1%
27.4%
Q2 24
11.1%
27.1%
Net Margin
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
52.6%
Q4 25
4.4%
24.6%
Q3 25
4.5%
25.3%
Q2 25
8.4%
21.1%
Q1 25
10.3%
24.3%
Q4 24
9.7%
Q3 24
9.3%
20.7%
Q2 24
8.5%
20.5%
EPS (diluted)
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.68
Q3 25
$2.80
Q2 25
$2.13
Q1 25
$2.60
Q4 24
Q3 24
$1.88
Q2 24
$1.82

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$833.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$16.2B
$5.1M
Total Assets
$30.9B
$1581.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.18×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$833.7M
$111.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$103.7B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$109.1B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$90.7B
Q4 24
$714.7M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$91.1B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$90.2B
Total Debt
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.9B
$341.7B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$324.1B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$320.1B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$297.0B
Q4 24
$2.9B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$291.2B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$269.9B
Stockholders' Equity
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
$5.1M
Q4 25
$16.2B
$111.6B
Q3 25
$17.3B
$110.0B
Q2 25
$18.2B
$108.2B
Q1 25
$17.8B
$106.8B
Q4 24
$17.1B
Q3 24
$17.3B
$103.6B
Q2 24
$17.5B
$100.7B
Total Assets
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
$1581.4B
Q4 25
$30.9B
$1420.3B
Q3 25
$31.4B
$1364.8B
Q2 25
$32.2B
$1353.9B
Q1 25
$32.0B
$1300.3B
Q4 24
$31.3B
Q3 24
$31.0B
$1258.0B
Q2 24
$32.2B
$1212.4B
Debt / Equity
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.18×
3.06×
Q3 25
0.17×
2.95×
Q2 25
0.16×
2.96×
Q1 25
0.16×
2.78×
Q4 24
0.17×
Q3 24
0.17×
2.81×
Q2 24
0.17×
2.68×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.4B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$938.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.90×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.4B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.4B
$-2.4B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$-3.3B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$11.8B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$-24.0B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Free Cash Flow
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$938.8M
Q3 25
$944.6M
Q2 25
$725.6M
Q1 25
$824.2M
Q4 24
$997.2M
Q3 24
$730.7M
Q2 24
$852.6M
FCF Margin
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
11.4%
Q3 25
10.7%
Q2 25
8.8%
Q1 25
9.0%
Q4 24
10.8%
Q3 24
7.5%
Q2 24
8.7%
Capex Intensity
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.6%
Q3 25
4.2%
Q2 25
4.2%
Q1 25
3.2%
Q4 24
3.4%
Q3 24
3.7%
Q2 24
3.4%
Cash Conversion
IMO
IMO
MS
MS
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.90×
-0.55×
Q3 25
3.34×
-0.72×
Q2 25
1.54×
3.34×
Q1 25
1.19×
-5.56×
Q4 24
1.46×
Q3 24
1.20×
Q2 24
1.44×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons