vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (INEO) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RxSight, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $30.8M, roughly 1.1× INNEOVA Holdings Ltd). INNEOVA Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -28.1%, a 28.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. INNEOVA Holdings Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.5M vs $-2.3M).
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
INEO vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $243.0K | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.0K | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.2M | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $52.6M | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.26× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $305.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $183.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-301.0K | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.8% | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-301.0K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.8% | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INEO
Segment breakdown not available.
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
